How Ranked-Choice Voting Benefits Candidates and Voters

In the evolving landscape of electoral politics, crowded primaries have become a recurring challenge. With more candidates entering the field, the traditional "first-past-the-post" system often results in fractured voter bases, divisive campaigns, and nominees who may not represent the majority’s preference. Ranked-choice voting (RCV) offers a promising alternative, addressing these issues while fostering collaboration and unity. By examining recent examples, particularly from Virginia’s 10th District, we can better understand how RCV is reshaping the dynamics of primary elections.

How RCV Works in Crowded Primaries

Ranked-choice voting allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than selecting just one. If no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Their votes are redistributed to the voters’ second-choice candidates. This process continues until one candidate secures a majority.

A recent example of RCV in action occurred during Virginia’s 10th Congressional District primary, where the Republican Party adopted RCV for their firehouse primary. With 11 candidates vying for the nomination, RCV ensured that the eventual nominee, Hung Cao, emerged with broad support. Cao’s favorability among primary voters stood at an impressive +78 net rating, significantly higher than traditional primary results typically yield.

Benefits of RCV

Ranked-choice voting addresses several challenges associated with crowded primaries, offering benefits for candidates, voters, and parties alike.

1. Better-Positioned Nominees:

• RCV often produces nominees with higher favorability ratings. In the Virginia 10th District example, Cao’s high net favorability highlighted the system’s ability to unite voter bases. Compared to Virginia’s 7th District, which used a traditional primary system, the differences were stark. In the 7th, the nominee had a net favorability of +51, considerably lower than Cao’s +78.

2. Reducing Negative Campaigning:

• Traditional primaries incentivize candidates to attack frontrunners, as winning often requires reducing competitors’ vote shares. In contrast, RCV encourages coalition-building, as candidates benefit from being voters’ second or third choices. In Virginia’s 10th District, 84% of voters described the campaign as positive, compared to 50% in the 7th District. This shift in tone fosters unity and positions candidates better for the general election.

3. Encouraging Informed Electorates:

• RCV requires voters to engage with multiple candidates to make informed decisions about their rankings. This process naturally promotes a deeper understanding of candidates’ platforms and positions, resulting in a more educated electorate.

4. Long-Term Candidate Development:

• Even candidates who don’t win under RCV benefit from increased visibility and positive impressions. For instance, in the 10th District, runners-up Janine Lawson and Brandon Michon emerged with strong favorability ratings, positioning them well for future elections. This "pipeline effect" strengthens parties by cultivating a bench of viable candidates.

Challenges and Critiques

While RCV offers clear benefits, it also faces challenges that must be addressed for broader adoption:

1. Resistance to Change:

• Many voters, particularly conservatives, are wary of changes to traditional voting methods. This skepticism is rooted in a preference for stability and a reluctance to adopt systems perceived as experimental.

2. Gradual Adoption is Essential:

• Successful implementation of RCV often begins at the local level. Cities and towns using RCV for municipal elections help familiarize voters with the system, building confidence and trust over time. For example, adoption in local council or mayoral races creates a foundation for scaling RCV to congressional or statewide elections.

3. Complexity and Communication:

• Educating voters about how RCV works is critical to its success. Misunderstandings about the ranking process can lead to frustration or disengagement. Campaigns and election officials must invest in clear, accessible voter education initiatives.

Long-Term Impacts of RCV

Ranked-choice voting has the potential to transform the electoral process, creating lasting benefits for both parties and voters:

1. Strengthening Party Unity:

• By reducing negativity in primary campaigns, RCV helps unify parties heading into general elections. Nominees can focus on persuading swing voters rather than mending intra-party rifts.

2. Building a Broader Candidate Pool:

• The positive experiences of runners-up encourage them to remain engaged in politics. This pipeline of candidates ensures a steady supply of qualified individuals for future elections, strengthening the party’s long-term prospects.

3. Enhancing Voter Engagement:

• An informed and engaged electorate is a cornerstone of democracy. RCV’s emphasis on understanding candidates’ platforms promotes active participation and reduces voter apathy.

4. Addressing Crowded Primaries:

• With the number of multi-candidate primaries tripling since 2010, RCV offers a sustainable solution. By mitigating the risks of vote-splitting and producing consensus nominees, RCV ensures that crowded fields don’t undermine electoral outcomes.

Conclusion

Ranked-choice voting represents a significant innovation in electoral politics, offering a practical solution for the challenges posed by crowded primaries. By fostering positive campaigns, producing well-positioned nominees, and encouraging voter engagement, RCV addresses many of the shortcomings of traditional voting systems.

While challenges remain, including voter education and resistance to change, the benefits of RCV make it a compelling option for parties seeking to adapt to the realities of modern elections. Gradual adoption, starting at the local level, can pave the way for broader implementation, ultimately strengthening democracy and ensuring fairer, more representative outcomes.

As political landscapes continue to evolve, ranked-choice voting offers a path forward, helping candidates, parties, and voters navigate the complexities of today’s crowded primaries.

Want even more news and insights from the pros who make politics happen? Become a Campaign Trend Insider and unlock exclusive, subscriber-only content every week for just $10 per month. Also remember to subscribe to our YouTube Channel for podcasts and additional content.