The 2021 paper "Poison Parasite Counter: Turning Duplicitous Mass Communications Into Self-Negating Memory-Retrieval Cues" explores a tactic that embeds a strong counter-message directly into a copy of a misleading political ad, so whenever voters see the original ad again, they automatically recall the counter-message. This method has been shown to effectively reduce trust in the deceptive ad and influence voter behavior over time.
What Did They Study?
The researchers set out to address the challenge of countering deceptive political ads, especially when one side has more resources and greater exposure. Their objective was to test a method called the Poison Parasite Counter (PPC), which embeds a strong counter-message within a replica of a rival’s misleading communication. The goal was to see if this strategy could undermine the deceptive message over time by making the counter-message stick in voters’ minds through repeated exposures. By doing so, they aimed to explore whether this approach could effectively reduce trust in dishonest ads and influence voter behavior.
How Did They Perform The Study?
The researchers conducted seven randomized experiments with 3,678 participants to test the effectiveness of the Poison Parasite Counter (PPC) technique. Participants were shown political ads, including fictional and real campaign messages, followed by counter-messages either presented traditionally or embedded using the PPC strategy. In some cases, participants saw the original deceptive ads multiple times, allowing the researchers to measure how well the counter-message stuck over time. They analyzed how the PPC affected voters’ perceptions of the ad’s honesty and their likelihood to support the candidate, comparing it to traditional methods of countering deceptive communication.
What Did They Find?
The study found that the Poison Parasite Counter (PPC) was significantly more effective than traditional counter-messaging methods. When the counter-message was embedded within a replica of a deceptive ad, participants were more likely to recall the counter-message each time they saw the original ad. This led to a lasting decrease in trust toward the deceptive ad and a reduction in the likelihood of supporting the candidate featured in it. The PPC approach also proved resilient over time, continuing to influence participants’ perceptions and behavior even after repeated exposures to the misleading ad, making it a powerful tool for political campaigns.
Takeaways
- By embedding strong counter-messages directly into replicas of misleading communications, campaigns can create lasting recall of those counter-messages whenever voters see the original ad.
- This method is especially useful for under-resourced campaigns, as it allows them to piggyback on the rival’s ad exposure.
- The PPC works best when it targets the trustworthiness of the opponent, focusing on perceived deception rather than just factual inaccuracies.
.png){kind=icon}